FastLane

GM Blogs

Random GM car 

Camaro Convertible Revealed

By Ed Peper
North America Vice President, Chevrolet

A few months ago, we showed you some official “spy shots” of the pre-production version of the new Camaro coupe.

To say the least, response to that post was overwhelmingly enthusiastic - something that was extremely gratifying to all of us here at Chevrolet, who have been hard at work testing and retesting the Camaro development models.

As a reward for your interest - and your patience - here’s a sneak peek of the convertible version of the Camaro, which is also undergoing a similar evaluation as we ready it for full production later next year. (Preproduction models shown. Actual production models may vary.)

camaro-1.jpg

camaro-2.jpg

83 Comments

  • June 13th, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    David

    Very nice, Ed. Can you say if that is the design for the final production headlights?

  • June 13th, 2008 at 3:54 pm

    jg95z28

    I guess we can safely assume those are the production headlamps. Dang Ed, I thought the coupe was nice, but the convertible is sexy… even with the top up!

    I just may have to buy one of each now.

  • June 13th, 2008 at 4:22 pm

    Jakep1973

    Can we get some high res photos? I would like to see how close the top follows the coupes body lines. Cool stuff though.

  • June 13th, 2008 at 4:30 pm

    Joe B

    Awesome job on that top!! I’ve never seen one that keeps such a close resemblance to the coupe! And thanks, Ed: We Camaro-nutjobs like being rewarded.

    I swear, if you guys don’t sell a million of these cars, I’ll be surprised! (okay, so I exagerrated a little bit)

    And, I gotta ask, too…try to keep Scott from hitting me…are those the real headlights?

  • June 13th, 2008 at 4:30 pm

    HotCarNut

    Ed,

    All I can say is PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE offer the convertible in an SS variant!!!

    Here’s to hoping!
    Nathan

  • June 13th, 2008 at 4:44 pm

    Nitz

    In the words of Johnny Bravo….Ohhhhh Mama!!

    Standard: 2.0 L I4 Ecotec engine equipped with a dual-scroll turbocharger. 260 HP

    Middle: The 3.6 L (3564 cc) LLT direct injected version of the LY7. 302 HP

    SS: A G8 GXP 6.2 liter 402 hp (300 kW) V8 and a 6-speed manual transmission

  • June 13th, 2008 at 4:45 pm

    Rum Doodle

    Great. Gasoline in the U.S. just passed $4.00 per gallon and is headed towards $5.00. And more than 100 million new cars will hit the roads in China and India in the next five years putting even more of a strain on oil supplies, driving the price of gas even higher.

    The quality of life in America is about to change drastically, and you want the American public to get excited about a convertible with an internal combustion engine that rightly belongs in the 1960’s.

    What exactly is the market you see for this car as motor fuel prices continue to spike, and an ever-growing percentage of consumer income must go to pay those higher prices?

  • June 13th, 2008 at 5:03 pm

    Tim De Young

    Man this car just keeps looking better and better.
    Thanks for the pictures Ed! :)
    Tim De Young
    5thGen.org

  • June 13th, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    André

    Very nice car. You should sell it worldwide, including my country (Brazil). You already sell a Zeta here (the Aussie Omega AKA Holden VE Commodore) so we can expect a lot of components in common, easying the life of the dealers network.
    But I’m expecting the Alpha basis. This platform, if correctly managed, would be the redemption for us, who want a RWD car, but not so expensive. A lot of people in the world just buy the 3-Series because it’s the nearest to an honestly-priced RWD ride with a rational size. Make something like this, priced like a FWD mid-size car, as spacious as a 5-Series and also very easy to assemble in any part of the world and you’ll have a winner in hands.

  • June 13th, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    André

    Very nice car. You should sell it worldwide, including my country (Brazil). You already sell a Zeta here (the Aussie Omega AKA Holden VE Commodore) so we can expect a lot of components in common, easying the life of the dealers network.
    But I’m expecting the Alpha basis. This platform, if correctly managed, would be the redemption for us, who want a RWD car, but not so expensive. A lot of people in the world just buy the 3-Series because it’s the nearest to an honestly-priced RWD ride with a rational size. Make something like this, priced like a FWD mid-size car, as spacious as a 5-Series and also very easy to assemble in any part of the world and you’ll have a winner in hands.

  • June 13th, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    edvard

    That’s an incredibly attractive car. Regardless of fuel prices, it’ll sell quicker than you can make them.

    By the way, do GM bloggers get a discount? I want one!

  • June 13th, 2008 at 6:03 pm

    Frank Davis

    Ed,

    Just looked at the production pics in my July Road & Track. Why is the interior so freakin ugly? It reminds me of the overly plasticky hodgepodge Pontiac interior designs of the 80’s - and that is not a good thing. The outside is drop dead gorgeous, but you guys fell way short in the interior. Look’s like Bo and his team took the cheap route - and Chevy will be the ultimate loser. It’s too bad, really.

  • June 13th, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    Stephen

    Wow… very very nice… I hope that those headlights make it for the production…

    NICE!!!

  • June 13th, 2008 at 6:19 pm

    ollie gibbs

    bob since the 3800 eng. is going away in cars put it in the small truck.It gets great mpg.We need relief now.Sure would like to see a four clyinder diesel to.

  • June 13th, 2008 at 6:25 pm

    Edwin

    Ed,

    This is a great looking car. Let’s hope it doesn’t vary too much from the concept. The headlights and tail lights are perfect on the concept. The wheels shown here are nice.

    Things are really looking good for Chevy with the new products. The Malibu is a winner. Keep the new designs coming. We love them.

  • June 13th, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    Christopher Popa

    Mr. Peper,

    Thank you for sharing these photos.

    After all, if there’s interest for many of the Internet car sites to post “spy” shots of the Camaro, why at this point shouldn’t GM put some actual ones on its official site?

    Now could you please do this here for all of your brands, such as the production version of the stylish Buick Invicta?

    GM should be the first one to start a buzz about its cars, not the last!

    - Christopher Popa

  • June 13th, 2008 at 7:35 pm

    Robert Farago

    Wow! Sexy! One question: how much does this thing weigh? Actually, two. Are you guys really thinking about putting a turbo-four into this bad boy?

  • June 13th, 2008 at 7:39 pm

    Scott

    So no Chevy emblem on the front?

  • June 13th, 2008 at 8:13 pm

    j.p. martin

    WHEN CAN I GET MY DROP TOP!

  • June 13th, 2008 at 9:11 pm

    Jax f-body fan

    I like it as a current 2001 Trans Am WS6 convertible owner.

    Hopes for the Camaro convertible as my potential next car: Bring on a turbo charged four hybrid. I want performance and economy. Or, at least, give me auto shutoff at traffic lights to help save gas (mild hybrid?)

    Make the back seats more usable than the last gen cars.

    Please, please give me an integrated power boot rather than the last gen’s three piece or a cloth boot.

    The styling is great and here’s hoping the production car’s interior stays true to the concept and isn’t anywhere close to the spyshots floating out there.

  • June 13th, 2008 at 9:38 pm

    MastrCake

    Wow. I am stunned at how well they got that top to fit!

    Simply amazing… I would happily wait an extra year for the look and the wind-in-your-face experience.

    Keep up the good work, Ed!

  • June 13th, 2008 at 11:04 pm

    F. Stephen Masek

    I am 6′ 1″, so wonder if I will fit in either the coupe or convertible? The roof looks very low.

  • June 13th, 2008 at 11:10 pm

    Glen

    If you make it on the Volt platform for $30,000 or less, I will rename my first born to Ed.

  • June 14th, 2008 at 12:36 am

    Rob

    I love this car. I would love to have one if gas wasn’t at $4 and going up..

    I know about the 4 turbo you guys have planed for this car…. I have a bad feeling this is gonna be a temporary run. Heck even Ford is way down on making the Mustang.

  • June 14th, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    McLovin

    @ Rum Doodle;

    Why don’t you petition BMW & MB to stop making the 7 & S series? Or lexus to drop their LF-S?
    People want this car, the Camaro is a great looking, great performing car. If you don’t like it say so and leave it at that. Comment on the car, leave the world’s economy out of this.

  • June 14th, 2008 at 10:53 pm

    Mike Calapai

    Please just make it affordable
    , get it here!!!!!!!!! If the ragtop is close to the price of the Mustang im in!!As for fuel economy I think the AFM or displacment on demand is fine for me Please GM again just make it affordable,

  • June 15th, 2008 at 3:46 pm

    Fred Turner

    Ed, I can’t wait until I can actually hug one myself! It looks fantastic and as I told Bob Lutz in this very space when the Concept version was in discussion, don’t bastardize it and it’ll sell like crazy! You didn’t and it will! I’m glad there will be many different versions too. I think the 2.0 duel scroll turbo is a great idea. It has more power than my 89 Iroc-Z had! Plus, I think by this time next year there will be alot of people tired of all the econo-cars being pushed on them because of fuel prices. Everybody over at Camaro5.com is excited and appreciates the occasional posts by some of you also! I’m Camaro10 by the way!
    Thanks again, can’t wait to see it in the flesh!!

  • June 15th, 2008 at 6:46 pm

    bob

    I just looked over a SRT challenger, nice piece, Big wheels, More rear seat room than Mustang, but I don’t have any headroom on a sunroof equipped car, the top don’t drop, and it’ a f–k’n Chrysler, I love my 69 Camaro conv. my C-6 vett, and even my 02 Malibu.

  • June 15th, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    Joe, Cleveland OH

    Ed,

    I knew there’d be a good share of nay-sayers to post here with the whole gas price thing going on, but I’ve been following the development of the Camaro since even before it was official from Rick back in August of ‘06. I am an avid participant in many forums dedicated to following the development to the 5th gen Camaro, and have held great discussions with a certain “father” whose initials are SS (I think you know who I am talking about).

    I have no doubt this Camaro will NOT be a gas hog of the old days when cast iron, carburated engines and only 3 or 4 speeds in the trans meant you were lucky to get 20 mpg. I have no fear that the 3.6 VVT will yield 30 or more on the highway and around 20 in the city. The LS3 MPG ratings should surprise alot of people as well.

    This car is going to sell. If for anything, its unique in style and has a historical pedigree - I think people are going to tire very quickly of driving around in cars that all look the same.

    Great job on the Camaro! I have a good sized down payment already saved (thanks to the fact you made the announcement over 2 years before production).

  • June 16th, 2008 at 10:00 am

    Rum Doodle

    ~ “leave the world’s economy out of this.”

    McLovin,

    If you don’t understand or care about what happens in China, India, Brazil, and other countries over the next 5-10 years that’s your business. But whether you care or not, they will affect your future lifestyle.

    And the world economy will have a direct effect on the future of GM. Cars such as the next-generation Camaro are no more than a sideshow — and I even bet that GM realizes that.

  • June 16th, 2008 at 10:49 am

    Is it time for a new camaro?

    Does anyone else feel that you have seen this car so many times it feels old now? and it hasnt even been released! We have been seeing photos of this vehicle for the past few years (including Transformers movie) and now to me it doesn’t feel special. Actually, it seems worse because we see nothing but the prototype and now it looks not as cool since it will be dumb down for the public. The new mustang coming out has been hidden from the public for awhile and when it will debut, it will be ready in a year for release. I am not saying it doesn’t look good, I am just comparing it to a big blockbuster, all this hype (+2 years) for the best stuff we have already seen in the preview. I hope they are making a new body because it has already been out for almost 3 years.

  • June 16th, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    jamie

    sigh….:)

  • June 16th, 2008 at 1:20 pm

    John Green

    Camaro Team:

    Stunning! Nice job and great looks!

    Not much else to say other then when Can I order my coupe?

  • June 16th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    Sean

    Nice looking car. Scale it down to resonable size, put the car on a diet (are 20″s really necessary?) and I’d buy one!

  • June 16th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

    jg

    Looks great, BUT, GM needs another 4 seat convertible that is upscale. It is time to bring a convertible with a backseat to Buick and Cadillac. What are you waiting for? If you can turn the Enclave into an Acadia, Outlook, and Traverse, surely the Saab 9-3 can become a Riviera and Caddy convertible.

  • June 16th, 2008 at 3:31 pm

    The Chevy Guy

    The soft top is going to be a huge hit in Calif. We have received over 100 calls with requests for the convertible so far and it will only increase. Chevy has finally put some wind back in Chevy muscle car fans sails.

    I have just added another review to our site here:
    http://www.2010-Chevroelt-Camaro.com
    and hope everyone would enjoy it.

    The Chevy Guy

  • June 16th, 2008 at 3:52 pm

    Pam, Phoenix, AZ

    Ed,
    This is a great car! I was just 17 when I got my 67 convertible, then I went to an 69 and then to a 85. I have been waitting for this one since I first viewed it! I’m not 48 and will get one. Just a thought…do you need a cute little spokes person here in AZ? I’ve got the “little” part down pat!
    Thanks!

  • June 16th, 2008 at 7:44 pm

    ILoveGM

    “As goes GM goes America”. That is an incredible car. Will people want it or will they stand in line to buy a rolling coffin called a SmartCar?

    I’d love a new Camero, have fond memories of my first one. However, I live 49 miles form work and gas is killing me, gonna have to pass.

    I am really sad about what is going on with our country now. All the layoffs, gas prices. Please support these people:
    http://www.AmericansForJobsAndEnergy.org/

    Maybe Fastlane can send people over there? This is getting serious folks, lets do something!

  • June 16th, 2008 at 10:21 pm

    Joe, Cleveland OH

    Chevy guy,

    I will also email you personally through that web site you’ve posted, but you have posted some presumputous and incorrect information about the Camaro that we KNOW of to this point:

    Of main concern, the V8 engine has NOT been officially named (not even to dealers or high ranking representatives - only the Camaro engineering team and the 12 disciples, who had to sign a confidentiality agreement which to this day I’m sure none of them violated, know what engine will be in the SS or Z/28), but common sense would dictate it would most likely be the LS3, NOT the LS2 as you have stated on your website (the LS3 is in the G8 GT, and the LS2 is an older engine design)…. so what I’m asking is that you do not post information that you do not know to be true.

    I would also submit that tire and brake sizes are also not finalized - those tire sizes you’ve seen in spy pics are on IVER cars, not final spec. Same goes for brake sizes - again, nothing has been finalized or officially released to the public.

    I have to say it irritates me when dealerships say things to be true that they do not know, only to pump the exitement of the car up so they can justify an insipid dealer markup.

    I’ll also advise anyone reading that to take it with a grain of salt. I’m sure the Camaro engineering team and General Motors would appreciate if you change the tone and information of that web site to better reflect what we see in spy pics is still nothing more than speculative.

  • June 17th, 2008 at 2:49 am

    Jerrad Lorlovick

    Dear Ed,

    I was just wondering,is the Camaro going to have T-top’s or sunroof,or maybe even a de-tachable roof.

  • June 17th, 2008 at 9:29 am

    tony winds

    Very nice …. classic body lines are prevalent from the past. Front and rear are beautiful and tough looking at the same time …. except one thing. Grille is a little too smiley faced …. it’s saying “Hi, my name is Cam !”
    Straighten it out please. The only other thing is finesse the underbody to fit wider meats in the back … they look too narrow already ! Diameters are perfect. Don’t make the same mistake Mustang and Challenger did with their tires … too narrow … when you drive behind them you’ll see what I’m talking about. Funny looking for the type of image they’re supposed to uphold.

  • June 17th, 2008 at 9:02 pm

    Analyst

    Does anyone else realize the economy is in a transitional phase? Yes gas is $4 but the dollar has deprecated exponentially. Once the market equalizes and reaches an equilibrium, prices will retreat and crude oil will be less expensive to import. Thus the price of gas WILL fall. Just give it some time.

  • June 17th, 2008 at 11:18 pm

    Joe

    I was wondering if that Camaro I saw with the Mfg plate was an IVER or PreProduction on Sun. June 14th in Suburban Detroit. It was a nice Fathers day for someone, me included, my kids spotted it before I did. They were drooling to see one on the road asking when it’s supposed to hit the market, because I work for GM.But I was suprised because of the Autoblog.com, spy photos showing a camo’d Camaro a couple of days before, missed out on a non-camo’d Camaro, and Glossy Black at that running the roads for all to see its glorious lines and sheen without the copyrighted letters of someones name for rights to a photo in a trade mag or blog. In the words of the Great One…Oh, how sweet it is!!!! My only regret is that we have just purchased a Malibu and have a one year old Acadia and could not justify another car when it does go on sale. Will have to wait…by the way if gas was $6/gal. I would still buy one..V6 or Turbo Four…Its the Design I love not just the fuel economy. Who knows when our Malibu wears out maybe by then there will be a Hybrid Ext. Range EV Camaro. Who knows?

  • June 18th, 2008 at 9:40 am

    Rum Doodle

    ~ “Once the market equalizes and reaches an equilibrium, prices will retreat and crude oil will be less expensive to import. Thus the price of gas WILL fall.”

    What? There are hundreds of millions of Indians and Chinese about to move into the middle-class. They will all want cars so they can emulate the lifestyle they see in Western Europe and North America. (And who can blame them?)

    There were plenty of resources in the world to let markets equalize when only Western Europeans and North Americans were the primary consumers. It’s a completely different case when the entire world wants to consume at the same rate as we do.

    I don’t share your hope that the markets for vital resources will stabilize. If everyone in the world consumed at the rate we North Americans do, it would take 2 1/2 worlds worth of resources to supply the demand. The last time I checked, there is only one world for us to tap into.

  • June 18th, 2008 at 10:29 am

    chiefpontiac

    Dang it! Now you’ve done it, if the price is reasonable (in the vicinity of a G6 retractable) then I may have to reconsider trading in for a new G8 and instead add a Camaro softtop to the family stable.

  • June 18th, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    Ted

    Since the hartop Camaro is still not for sale after all these years, I find it hard to get excited about the convertible. With the fuel economy more on the forefront, the retro ponycar market may be history before you finally get into production ! The original Camaro trailed the Mustang intro by a couple years too, but not this much !

  • June 18th, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    Brian Clark

    Ed, looks great. You’re doing great work with the brand!
    Brian Clark

  • June 18th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    Rick

    I have a Solstice GXP and that small 2.0 turbo is the cat’s meow. Why not use the 2.8 V6 turbo as the new Z28? Better mileage and power on demand. The small block LS is a great engine, but with the price of gas, the 2.8 turbo makes sense, it’s already in the Saab’s and a twin turbo would make a true Z28.

  • June 18th, 2008 at 3:21 pm

    Jose Reyes

    Nice!! looks very good. however the back side windows are smaller than the coupes. Really I think that it should resemble the coupe design more closely. Personally I think that the ultimate 2010 camaro convertible should have a hard top roof convertible just like the 2008 Pontiac G6.

  • June 18th, 2008 at 10:27 pm

    Les

    - almost looks as nice as the new Dodge Challenger on the street right now . If someone wants a nice 60 musclecar. This Camaro is a Beauty though. They Retro’ed it just right.
    -good luck
    sell and million of em and GM stays open for another year.

  • June 18th, 2008 at 10:29 pm

    joe

    I have read about the ‘delay’ or ‘poor timing’ comments and would like to rebuff these very simply! Without insulting anyones intelligence. But don’t good things take time to do, and bad things happen really fast? Case in point; Malibu/CTS didn’t happen overnite, yet both have been sold very well and have received numerous accolades from Consumers Report to Car & Driver. No one sniped about the timing for the C6 or ZR1 which will be one of the fastest production cars comparable to Lamborghini or Ferrari with Chevrolet pricing.

    So why ding the Camaro so much about the timing? Remember what happened when GM rushed the SSR and GTO in, everyone sounded like they wanted it but the sales proved otherwise.

    In this case the Camaro will be what it’s meant to be a new version of an old favorite. Not a flash in the pan mediocre vehicle without foundation. And to counter the issue with someone’s forecast about pony cars becoming too late. At least this is not putting on a set of modified skin atop of a modern day chassis and powertrain with updated electronics. This car, the Camaro, is a ‘clean sheet design’ paying tribute to some classic form and function. So give the General some credit, it’s not a rush job!

    Truly, some will purchase it for those merits alone, others will just plain, “GOTTA HAVE IT!”. Patience is truly a virtue, not just a cliche’. And finally not everyone has to buy it, just those who truly want to spend their hard earned money on what they want no matter the critics!

  • June 19th, 2008 at 11:40 am

    Brady Turley

    The car looks great, but its too little too late. Too much hype in the beginning and now its dwindling down. As the saying goes, you must strike when the iron is hot, but this iron has been sat out in the rain. Turbo 4 option or not, its going to sell well for a short-time as people already put money away. But, its going the way of the GTO after that. I myself love the car, but now am at a point where I would rather take the G8 GT and get my satifaction now. Im not the only one who echos this…

  • June 19th, 2008 at 12:33 pm

    chuckiboo

    Absolutely awesome! This will be the best GM product in years, besides the CTS. The Camaro is gonna be a huge hit when it goes on sale next year. Hopefully the top folds flush with the body, giving it a clean, sleek look. Can’t wait to get one.

  • June 19th, 2008 at 9:56 pm

    John

    Way to show up at the party too late GM!

    At 4.50 per gallon in CA and 15mpg, that’s $45 every 150 miles.

    Use it as a daily driver for 15k miles a year, and that’s $4500 in gas.

    Own it 5 years and you’ll have spent $22.5k in gas alone, and then there are the car payments (including the usual dealer gouging) on top of that.

    If it’s not coming out until 2010, how about throwing the Volt drivetrain underneath.

  • June 19th, 2008 at 10:46 pm

    SteveG

    OT-we have seen pics of the next Cobalt front and back and I have to say you had better go back to the drawing board. It looks cheap and Korean. Why didnt you just let whoever designed the Traverse and Malibu design the Cobalt? What has GMDAT ever produced that wasn’t garbage? The Aveo is the worst car in its segment.
    We all expected the next Cobalt to go up against the Mazda 3, not the Hyundai Accent.
    If you fail with the next Cobalt and Astra, its curtains for GM.

  • June 20th, 2008 at 10:49 am

    Joe B

    John, it’s coming out within months: early 2009. It’s MODEL YEAR will be a 2010.

    So completely revamping the car at this point would be unbelieveably dumb. And since the Volt drivetrain isn’t even ready for the Volt, yet…I daresay that’s gonna be a problem with throwing it under a totally different car.

    I do wonder where you got those mpg numbers from…expect more like 26-27mpg highway out of the Camaro V6. Yeah — it’s gonna be that good.

    And regarding the prototype Cobalt (if that’s what it is), I think if you guys flattened the roof a bit, like the current Cobalt, it will help the aggressive/sporty look tremendously. I want to stress the interior of the little car; please improve it from the current model: less hard plastic, namely. Other than that, I think you’re on the verge of another hit. The Cobalt right now is just ‘okay’, and it’s still selling amazingly well; good Job!!

  • June 20th, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    tik

    Just curious if this vehicle will be part of a hybrid line, I know its a sports car but offering a hybrid with looks like this would be very attractive.

  • June 20th, 2008 at 5:34 pm

    Jay

    Wowzer… what could have been a great convertible is the typical GM stinker, they’ve cheaped out yet again by making the camaro with a soft top. Even mazda miatas are available with as a hard top convertible. I’ll wait and see what Chrysler comes up with.

  • June 20th, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    Toolman

    I don’t like the way GM does not talk about the real gas mileage these vehicles can achieve. The corvette can get almost 30 MPG…with 505 HP that is awesome. The Camaro will probably be capable of 30 or so also. Yes you have to drive with the cruise on and be civil but thats ok when you need to save gas. The best part is the power is still under the hood when you have a little extra gas money in your pocket. Cracker jack cars get high 30’s people need to realize its the weight of the vehicles killing the mileage. Weight from crash bars, air bags, fancy electronics, sound deadening…and so on. We got what we asked for ..nicer / safer cars. Everything has a price. I will gladly take 5 mpg less for one of these great machines. If I need even better gas mileage….I’ll get a motorcycle at least 50 MPG and the power to avoid other vehicles. Loving your car and coolness is how American car companies became great…think of the personalization of the 50’s and 60’s. Our love affair with our cars demonstrates our individualism and creativeness…2 things that made America great. Don’t settle for average, similar, and monotonous. Lets be the great America again.

  • June 21st, 2008 at 6:08 am

    Bob

    I’ve been a GM guy since I was a pup. I have to tell you. I’m now very disappointed in the brand I used to support. Mainly because the “average Joe” out here cannot afford anything with any muscle. I have owned 4 Chevelle’s (3 of them being SS 396), 4 Camaro’s (67 through 71) and numerous pick-ups 69 through 2001. What happened to the day when the average blue collar worker could get a kick to the seat of his pants with a simple stab of the go pedal. I give up on you guys. Good luck staying in business, your going to need it.

  • June 23rd, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    Gereon (Germany)

    I’d suggest, that the Camaro will be offered in Germany also with an optional LPG-system, as already available for the HHR. Not to forget: We are paying about 9$/Gallon in the meanwhile. Ouch!

  • June 23rd, 2008 at 3:16 pm

    Edwin

    Toolman,

    The 07 Corvette convertable we drive to the beach gets 34 mpg on cruise control, and it uses regular gas. The foreign competition can’t match it. Only silence from the media.

  • June 24th, 2008 at 9:37 am

    Joe B

    Bob, what do you mean by that?

    The Camaro is going to be very affordable by today’s standards, just like it always has been.

    Somewhere in the range of 20,000 to 30,000 from V6 to V8, just like its competitors.

  • June 24th, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    Tim

    3 words:

    E-Flex Camaro Convertable.

    Silent open air electric driving… wonderful!

  • June 26th, 2008 at 9:19 am

    Ken Lally

    I was going to buy the Challenger (I have 3 modern Mopar products already), but the vert looks so nice. Way to go Chevy! You got it right, sign me up!

  • June 26th, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    John Green

    Camaro Team:

    Shame on you!

    Tempting me with such a delightful looking vehicle. All along I have been planning on a coupe and then you show this! Darn it all.

    So far you guys have been doing what appears to be an excellent job of balancing the needs dictated by Federal Mandates and those of the Enthusiast Community. Hopefully this will translate into one heck of a vehicle that will be desired by the general public.

    Even with this huge temptation, I will be sticking by my original decision to go for a coupe. (I already own a convertible now).

    Keep on keeping on guys!

  • June 26th, 2008 at 11:26 pm

    Claude Gelinas

    I’d love for GM to build a convertible car that can accomodate a 6′2” driver.

    It sounds so simple and yet, it seems to be a major hurdle.

    The Camaro looks fabulous and if I can fit -comfortably- in it, I’ll be looking to buy one!

  • June 27th, 2008 at 9:40 am

    noel priore

    Let me chime in here.First off,I have always loved GM’s cars.I have owned 5 1969 Camaros,2 70 chevelles ss,67 and 68 Firebirds in the past.I have driven GM since I was 16,I am now 40.I also am a GM employee working as a Parts Mgr for a local Chevrolet dealer since 1986.
    With that said,I am dissapointed with GM for the last few years.The new Camaro is very nice but to me and lots of others at my dealership,its a bit too late as is always the case with GM.Where was this car when the new Mustang came out??Why was it not in direct competition at that time?? Why is the new Challenger available right now?? Yet…still no Camaro!! And now,you want to release this car when gas is $4.50 a gallon???Who knows how much the gas will be when this car is actually released.This car should be out competing with your competition(Mustang & Challenger). The Mustang has fizzled out and the Challengers novelty will probably wear out by the time the Camaro is released too.I think when the Camaro comes out,if the gas is still high,people are not really going to care all that much.Sorry. People now are looking to save on gas.I do hope the Camaro is a hit,I dont want to doom the car,I just think GM’s timing always seems to be off.Heres a perfect example:
    The HHR. This car is far superior in every compared to a PT Cruiser yet they dont sell all that well.GM just does not advertise it to the public too good.Now imagine this came out in direct competetion with the PT when that car was introduced.I guarantee GM would have sold record numbers of it.Know what I drive? A fully loaded HHR! I love my car.
    While we are on the subject….GM….How about making a line of cars that compete with the Accords,Civics,Prius,Yaris…those types of cars.GM is banking on the VOLT but that comes out in what…2010?? Plus at 40-50 grand,how many working class families can actually afford to have one?!What are we as dealers supposed to do until then? Truck sales are non existent due to the gas…..Our dealer went from selling 125 cars/trucks to 85 and now to 30 or so a month.How can a dealer survive when GM who is supposed to offer products for us to sell cant even make a line of cars to compete with.Yes the Malibu is a big hit but you cant bank on one car to save a line.How come Toyota and Honda can make cars that sell and GM cant?How come Toyota made a hit with a Prius and GM cant? I would love to know what GM is thinking…..They are always behind everyone else.The big 3 is no longer GM,FORD AND CHRYSLER but rather Toyota,Honda and Hyundai. GM needs to let the public know we do have some fuel efficient cars and nor just trucks.Most every Chevy commercial on tv is always trucks.Let the people know we have the malibu,impala,hhr and the ugh…Aveo….
    Anyway,if GM does not start getting with the program and follow the other companies in thier own way,then GM has sealed its own fate.I really dont want to lose my job if my dealer closes.I blame no one but GM as they basically closed there eyes while the “import” companies ran right past them.Come on GM lets start being competitive again and take back America.Remember the Heartbeat of America????

  • June 27th, 2008 at 1:39 pm

    edvard

    If nobody else will say I will. The fact that GM stock was once again downgraded beyond junk levels indicates that in order to get your company back on track is going to require monumental changes. I realize that GM has already done so with products like the Malibu, upcoming Cobalt, the revamped Saturn and Buick lines, and the upcoming Volt.

    But so far, these have not been enough. What its going to take is some risk taking on one end, and some careful product analysis on the other. To this day, I still feel that GM ignores the small car market. The Malibu and Aura are nice, but the Cobalt ( the current model) and others in its camp are either uninspiring or outdated.

    To me, it is ashame that less emphasis is being placed on automakers from the investor’s standpoint because in reality, our futures and the way that we live will greatly depend on what vehicles we drive and how much fuel or lack thereof that they consume. Given that everyone on Wall Street is rushing to oil futures as yet another easy moneybubble is shameful. But if that’s the name of the game, then try to turn it into a positive by creating cars and trucks that consumers have to buy due to their heightened fuel economy.

    The focus needs to dramatically focus towards super fuel efficient cars and trucks, and not just from a single model, but for the entire lineup.

    Trust me- I do not want to wake up one day to read that GM went under. But to prevent this possibility, the time to make dramatic decisions is right now.

  • June 27th, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    Bob

    Great looking car. Sales forecast: Bleak. Let’s face it. Price of gas will hurt the bottom line. All the folks that say they’re excited and can’t wait to own one will never step up to the plate and make the purchase. I can’t blame them. $$$ is tight. Only the Camaro loyalists will buy and that in itself is a small niche crowd.

  • June 30th, 2008 at 2:12 pm

    Phil

    Just make sure the 4 cylinder is tuned to get high mileage,
    NOT FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE. There is little benefit to have it otherwise because in the little Solstice it only gets 19 mpg city!
    Besides, the other two engines serve that purpose. The masses will
    go for a BEAUTIFUL CAR that gets decent mileage and CAN BE INSURED.

    GET IT. Only the enhusiast minority will buy the other two versions because they would be percieved as offering you unnecessary levels of power for this era. So you start with those, then quickly introduce the new four-cylinder. DONE!!

  • June 30th, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    Phil

    Once again we have PROVEN that GM’s product development is an entire cycle (5 YEARS) BEHIND WHERE IT SHOULD BE.
    This car would have rocked the world as an early ‘05, beating Mustang to market and adding needed market share at the time.
    This is why from now until the ‘13 model year, if you introduce anything not on a NEW world-beating global platform, you will continue to lose, lose, lose, lose, lose, lose and lose in North America.

  • July 2nd, 2008 at 5:51 pm

    Rum Doodle

    ~ “Just make sure the 4 cylinder is tuned to get high mileage…”

    What would be the point of a high fuel mileage 4-cylinder Camaro?

    Anyone whose primary focus is economy (and that will soon be most of the world) won’t be buying a Camaro.

    Plus there are actually 4-cylinder cars already available that are much sportier and more exotic than the Camaro.

  • July 4th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    Matt

    No hardtop convertible = no sale.

  • July 9th, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    bsadan

    Nice retro of the Camaro.

    I will be brief. Jobs and prosperity are what I am interested in, that is reason for this e-mail. A complex business decision can save millions of dollars and hundreds if not thousands of jobs. The same result can be accomplished by the most absurd of details like a jingle. Plop Plop Fizz Fizz or your own “See the USA in a Chevrolet. The silliest of ideas becomes brilliant marketing strategy and creates something wonderful for all involved.
    Now is the time to strike. Your company just barely beat out Toyota in sales last month. A timely idea could hold off the competition.
    You already own the rights to the “See the USA” song. I implore you to consider the updated lyrics which tout GPS, Reliability, Work, Travel, Friends and America.
    Go to work today in a Chevrolet, America’s best selling car.
    See your friends today, drive a Chevrolet. You know it’s bound to go far.
    Drive from Maine to Cal-La-Forn-I-Ya . Always knowing where you are.
    Short and very musical is appealing as Americas got Talent.
    To whoever reads this may it brings you the success I know it can?

    D.H.Weemes
    Mobile, Al

  • July 17th, 2008 at 3:58 am

    Jose Reyes

    Ed Peper,

    I thank you and the chevy team for working so hard and making the 2010 camaro such an awesome car.
    I just have one question that I think deserves an honest answer. Does chevy have the technology to produce a hardtop convertible concept? If so I would like to see at least a computer animated sketch or something, if is not too much to ask.

  • July 18th, 2008 at 6:51 pm

    Thomas Denney

    Love the look of the convertible Camaro and would like to add, I personally would be very interested in a 400 horsepower Pontiac G8 GXP convertible. Big Fan of GM and the return of the muscle cars… only GM products in my driveway, today, tomorrow and forever.

  • July 19th, 2008 at 5:02 pm

    Ames Tiedeman

    Stunning!

  • July 19th, 2008 at 10:08 pm

    Ames Tiedeman

    Phil:

    You are being way too hard on GM. Look at the cars coming out from 2009 to 2014. They will lead.

  • July 20th, 2008 at 1:09 am

    Bob

    Bob, what do you mean by that?

    The Camaro is going to be very affordable by today’s standards, just like it always has been.

    Somewhere in the range of 20,000 to 30,000 from V6 to V8, just like its competitors.

    Reply to Joe B.
    By todays standards meaning what. Most American blue collars are still making about as much now as they were 10 or 15 years ago. I would roll over and drop dead if the Camaro (V-8 version, V-6 is useless) sold under 30K. I’ll believe it when I see it. By the way. I saw it posted at least once here and I agree, people looking to buy a Camaro usually don’t give a rats bannana about fuel mileage. I don’t. I just think GM has priced the ordinary guys who supported them forever, out of the buying game. If they can sell a V-8 version under 25K, I’ll be all over it.

  • July 21st, 2008 at 11:13 am

    Brady Turley

    There is really no problem with a turbo 4 Camaro. The mustang used to do that with their SVO’s, and now there is a strong relationship to that car and mustang fans. Just be sure there is a way to add more power to the 4 banger, and it will be a success.
    Just an idea in advance, have GMPP, SLP, or some other aftermarket company make lightweight body and interior parts.

  • July 31st, 2008 at 1:18 am

    2010 Camaro Details « Scott’s Blog

    [...] Don’t forget to get a look at GM’s leaked pictures of a production ready Camaro Convertible here. [...]

  • August 15th, 2008 at 4:53 pm

    Karan

    I LOVE IT! As soon as the convertible comes out, I’m getting one. Please let me know when I can pre-order or purchase one that is a pre-production model! I thought I saw one the other day, but the dealer told me that the cars were not out yet.

Leave a Reply

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

To protect against spam, off-topic and abusive comments, all comments are reviewed before being posted to the blog. Please limit your comments to two on each topic and don't use all caps. Also, please note that some comments related to specific ownership issues are forwarded to customer assistance rather than posted here.